Unveiling the System Challenges of Using FBDI for Miscellaneous Receipts in Oracle Fusion Inventory

 

In Oracle Fusion Inventory Management, the FBDI (File-Based Data Import) method is a widely adopted approach for importing Miscellaneous Receipt transactions. This method is particularly useful for handling bulk data uploads in a structured and repeatable manner, making it ideal for businesses with high-volume inventory operations or frequent data migration needs.

The process begins with downloading the Inventory Transactions Import FBDI template, which provides a standardized format for entering transaction data. Once the template is obtained, users are required to populate it with accurate and complete data, adhering strictly to the predefined structure and validation rules. After the data is entered, the template is used to generate a CSV file, which is then compressed into a ZIP format and uploaded through the Oracle Universal Content Management (UCM) system. Following the upload, the file is processed using the Load Interface File for Import scheduled process, which initiates the integration and imports the data into Oracle Fusion Inventory.

While this method offers a reliable way to automate and streamline the data import process, it also comes with certain limitations and challenges—particularly when dealing with specific transaction types such as miscellaneous receipts. There is no real-time error validation done for the account details entered in the FBDI template which otherwise is systematically validated while performing the miscellaneous receipt transactions from the UI.

This blog post provides a detailed explanation along with a comparative analysis of both approaches.

Scenario 1: Create Miscellaneous Transactions from UI

Account validation happens at individual segment level

·       System does not allow the invalid account segment while creating the miscellaneous receipt manually from the UI.

·       This real time validation helps in ensuring that the transactions are entered with the correct account code combination and will then get processed successfully through cost accounting processes.

·       Successful Validations: System doesn’t allow us to use invalid account code combination as mentioned below -

Scenario 2: Create Miscellaneous Transactions using FBDI

No account validation happens at individual segment level

·       The FBDI transactions do not honor the account validation at individual segment level.

·       Transaction gets completed successfully in Inventory with the invalid account code combination entered in the FBDI template.

·       This transaction then gets stuck with error in cost accounting, and it needs a lot of manual efforts for the datafix to get it processed successfully through accounting.

• This invalid account code cannot be just replaced to fix the error in cost accounting.
• To get such transactions processed, the invalid segment needs to be enabled for the respective ledger and get the transactions accounted successfully, followed by manual reclassification to the actual segment value replaced with the expected value.

 

System limitations summarized:

1.      As per the information available in Document 'FBDI Post Mass Transfers Doesn’t Check The End Date Of Segment Values In The Depreciation Expense Account (Doc ID 2768037.1) - This behaviour is intended. Validating every segment of the account may cause performance issues.

2.      Validating every segment of the account may cause performance issues.

3.      Due to this reason, development purposefully didn't add validation in API level which will be used for bulk operations like AdFDI, FBDI etc.

4.      Segment level End Date validation will not work for bulk operations like FBDI, AdFDI etc.

5.      If the account code combination itself is not present in the system, then it will not allow to complete the transaction and it will give an error while processing the transaction from interface tables to Inventory.

6.      In other case, if the account code combination is present in the system, then the transactions will not get stuck in the MTI (Inventory transactions interface).

7.      This transaction gets stuck in the cost accounting with the error of invalid account with specific segment details.

 

Conclusions:

·       There is no validation at individual segment end-date level for bulk operations like FBDI, AdFDI etc.

·       User can enter any random account code combination in the FBDI template irrespective of whether it is valid or not.

·       System doesn't do any validation on this account code combination in FBDI template, and it passes the same to inventory transactions without any error even if the account code is not valid.

a.      If the combination is not present, then the transaction gets stuck in MTI (Inventory Transactions Interface).

b.      If the account combination is present in the system, then the transaction will go through successfully from inventory.

·       Later this will get stuck in the cost accounting with invalid account combination error and then IT Support team needs to perform the datafix.

·       Therefore, it is crucial to thoroughly verify the account details entered in the FBDI template before processing the file.

Cost Accounting Error Analysis: A Practical Approach to Troubleshooting and Resolution

The Review Cost Accounting Processes UI in Oracle Fusion provides a centralized and intuitive platform for monitoring and managing cost accounting activities. It enables users to track the status of various cost-related processes in real time, such as cost import, cost processing, and cost distribution.

One of its key features is the ability to identify and analyze unprocessed or errored transactions, which may be blocking the completion of period-end close activities.

This includes transactions stuck due to data inconsistencies, missing references, or configuration issues.

By using this UI, finance and supply chain teams can proactively troubleshoot and resolve exceptions, ensuring that all transactions are successfully accounted for and that the cost accounting subledger remains accurate and complete. This not only supports a smoother and faster period-end close but also enhances financial integrity and reporting accuracy across the enterprise.

 

1.       All the error records are already grouped here under different buckets with Latest Process ID and can be viewed in below screen-

 

Supply Chain Execution -> Cost Accounting -> Cost Processing -> Create Cost Accounting Processes

2.      This Process ID would be same as the one that appears in the below navigation.

 

Supply Chain Execution -> Cost Accounting -> Cost Processing -> Create Cost Accounting Distributions

Parameters: Run Control

 

The following section presents a practical and structured approach to identifying the root causes behind various error messages encountered during cost accounting processes. It includes detailed analysis techniques, diagnostic tips, and common patterns observed across different transaction types.

Each error message is broken down to explain why it occurs, the specific business or configuration issue that may be triggering it, and the recommended resolution steps to address the underlying problem effectively.

By following this approach, users can systematically resolve issues, minimize recurring errors, and ensure smoother and more accurate cost processing within Oracle Fusion.

 

 

Error Message#1: “The work order completion transaction was not processed because the work order associated with this transaction has not yet been closed.”

Information Message#1: NA

Root Cause Analysis:

1.       Cost Profile Configured with Actual Cost Method:

The affected items are associated with a cost profile that uses the Actual Cost method. This method tracks and calculates costs based on the actual consumption of materials and resources, making it sensitive to transaction timing and work order status.

2.       Provisional Completion Option Set to 'Value at work order close':

Within the cost profile, the Provisional Completion setting is configured as ‘Value at Work Order Close.’ This means that the system defers cost valuation for work order completions until the work order is officially closed, not when the product is completed.

3.       Work Orders Partially or Fully Completed but Not Closed:

In these cases, the associated work orders (WOs) may have had product completions—either partial or full—but the work orders themselves remain open. Since the system is configured to value completions only at the time of closure, this creates a temporary hold in cost processing.

4.       Work in Process Product Completion Transactions Remain Unprocessed:

As a result of the above configuration and work order status, the Work in Process (WIP) Product Completion transactions are stuck in error. These transactions cannot be costed until the corresponding work orders are closed, causing them to appear as unprocessed or errored in the Review Cost Accounting Processes UI.

 

This analysis helps pinpoint the relationship between cost profile settings and work order lifecycle statuses, offering a clear path to resolving the issue by either adjusting configurations or ensuring timely closure of work orders.

 

 

Error Message#2: “The outgoing inventory transaction could not be costed because there is no layer cost for the item.”

Information Message#2: “Issue transaction was put on hold to avoid generating negative inventory.”

Root Cause Analysis:

1.       Cost Profile is Setup with Actual Cost Method

2.       Provisional Completion option in the Cost Profile is setup with Value at work order close.

3.       Produced Quantities Used in Downstream Transactions Before WO Closure:
The quantities produced through work orders—though not yet costed due to the pending work order closure—are subsequently consumed in various downstream transactions. These include Internal Transfers, Sales Order Fulfilments, Miscellaneous Issues, and even WIP Issues. Since the completion costs for these quantities are not yet accounted for (because the work orders are still open), the system faces a costing imbalance when trying to process these follow-on transactions.

4.       ‘Process Negative Quantity’ Option Set to ‘Never’:
The ‘Process Negative Quantity’ option in the cost profile is configured as ‘Never’ which restricts the system from processing transactions that would result in negative on-hand quantities or cost balances. When downstream transactions try to consume or move items whose costs haven't yet been recognized (due to pending work order closure), Oracle Fusion detects a negative balance situation and prevents the transaction from being processed. This results in costing errors that require manual intervention or resolution through corrective action.

 

This combination of configuration settings and transaction sequencing results in a scenario where downstream usage of incomplete-costed items leads to additional system errors. The resolution typically involves either closing the work orders in a timely manner, adjusting the cost profile settings, or managing transaction timing to align with cost accounting logic.

 

 

Error Message#3: “The transfer receipt cannot be costed until the issue transaction is fully processed with sufficient on-hand quantity”.

Information Message#3: “The trade in transit receipt can't be costed until the issue transaction is fully processed with sufficient on hand quantity.”

Root Cause Analysis:

1.       Cost Profile is Setup with Actual Cost Method

2.       Provisional Completion option in the Cost Profile is setup with Value at work order close.

3.       The quantities produced with the work orders which are still not closed as mentioned in Error#1, are subsequently used for Internal Transfers

4.       Process Negative Quantity option is setup as Never.

5.       Internal Transfer Orders Received in the Destination Organization:
The destination organization receives the internal transfer order and physically updates its inventory. However, because the source-side costs are not yet accounted for, the system is unable to derive the appropriate valuation for the receipt transaction. This results in a costing error during internal transfer receipt processing, as Oracle Fusion cannot complete the cost accounting entries without valid cost data from the source organization.

 

Error Message#4: ““The transaction wasn't processed because the cost processor can't determine the output costs.”

Information Message#4: “The receipt is missing a cost.”

Root Cause Analysis:

1.       Cost Profile is Setup with Actual Cost Method

2.       Provisional Completion option in the Cost Profile is setup with Value at work order close.

3.       The quantities produced with the work orders which are still not closed as mentioned in Error#1, are subsequently used for WIP Issue

4.       Process Negative Quantity option is setup as Never.

5.       The WIP completion is done for the subsequent work orders using the component items which are not costed in the previous transactions.

6.       Such Work in Process Product Completion transactions will be stuck this error.

 

Summarised Snapshot View:

 

This case highlights a practical analysis of the cost accounting errors resulting from specific cost profile configurations and transaction timing mismatches in Oracle Fusion.

Key configuration settings—such as the use of the Actual Cost method, Provisional Completion at Work Order Close, and Process Negative Quantity set to Never—contributed to downstream costing errors when partially completed work order quantities were used in subsequent transactions before closure.

 

 

 

Resolution of these errors typically involves:

·       Ensuring timely work order closures before using the output in downstream transactions.

·       Re-evaluating the ‘Provisional Completion’ and ‘Process Negative Quantity’ settings in cost profiles.

·       Temporarily adjusting process sequencing or configuration, where feasible, to allow uninterrupted costing.

 

Use Current Item Cost Attribute - Impact on Miscellaneous Transactions UI

  

Use Current Item Cost attribute in Inventory Organization Parameters: Impact on Miscellaneous Transactions UI

In Oracle Fusion Inventory Management, the "Use Current Item Cost" flag determines whether the system uses the existing item cost during transaction creation. When enabled, it automatically sets the "Use Current Item Cost" field to "Yes" on the Create Miscellaneous Transactions page. This ensures that for transactions like miscellaneous issues or receipts, the current on-hand item cost is applied, instead of a manually entered cost.

Scenario 1: Use Current Item Cost attribute is Unchecked

Navigate to Create Miscellaneous Transactions UI-

Use Current Item Cost Flag needs to be selected manually

Scenario 2: Use Current Item Cost attribute is Checked

 

Navigate to Create Miscellaneous Transactions UI-

Use Current Item Cost Flag gets defaulted automatically to Yes

 

What happens when the "Use Current Item Cost" flag is enabled in Inventory Organization Parameters -

1. System defaults Use Current Item Cost Flag to "Yes" on the Create Miscellaneous Transactions UI.
2. If you're creating a miscellaneous transaction, and this flag is enabled, then the system will automatically use the current cost of the item on hand when calculating the transaction's cost.
3. The attribute provided in the Inventory Organization Parameters works only with defaulting the value as Yes if this checkbox is enabled.
4. If the checkbox is disabled, then it doesn't default any value in the miscellaneous transactions UI. It remains Null and users need to specify manually if it is Yes or No.